W1 – Oge.Aniagboso – Tuckman Analysis Assessment
Result of the Assessment
I spent about 40 minutes in total performing the assessment/survey (including the time used to download and port the template into this report. The table below summarizes the result of the assessment.
Item Score Item Score Item Score Item Score
1. ___2___ 2.___3___ 4.___4___ 3. __3____
5. ___2___ 7.___5___ 6.____3__ 8. ___1___
10. ___4___ 9.__3____ 11.____4__ 12. __2____
15. ___4___ 16.___2___ 13.___5___ 14. ___5___
18. ___4___ 20.___3___ 19.___1___ 17. ___3___
21. ___4___ 23.___3___ 24.___1___ 22. __3____
27. ___3___ 28.____3__ 25.___3___ 26. ___2___
29. ____2__ 31.____3__ 30.___3___ 32. ___3___
TOTAL _25__ TOTAL _25__ TOTAL _24__ TOTAL _22__
Forming Stage Storming Stage Norming Stage Performing Stage
Where are we?
The results of the assessment are shown in the table above and as can be seen there is only a small difference among the scores. There are three possibilities with the results which include;
1. I do not have a clear perception of how our team currently operates
2. Our teams behaviors are highly volatile
3. We are in the Storming phase.
I will settle for the number 3 possibility, hence our team can be said to be at the storming stage right now. This was aptly demonstrated in the manner we handled the project plan towards securing the “Notice to Proceed”. We are done with the “Forming “ stage as the organization chart which shows the structure and responsibilities of key roles have be established. However, we are now trying to recover from an initial faulty start. One attribute of the “Storming” phase is that decisions are not easy within the team, however clarity of purpose increases notwithstanding that some uncertainties still remain. An example of such uncertainty is agreeing the structure of the individual time cards that will feed into the weekly reports.
What leadership style should we be adopting?
Research evidences have shown that there is no one-size-fits-all leadership style to adopt for a team. Those who dynamically adapt their behavior to match the demands of their unique team situation are considered to be successful leaders. Hersey and Blanchard’s model of situational leadership suggests the appropriate leadership style to use based on the functional maturity of the team or individual. An adaptation of the model is presented below;
The functional maturity in our situation relates to our level of understanding of the work that needs to be done (the weekly commitments). I will say that we are currently between M2 and M3, hence the appropriate leadership style right now for our team should be “Selling”/”Participating” – a mid-point between supportive and directive leadership behaviors.
Conclusions
The Bristol 12 team is currently in the “Storming” phase of the team development stages and given the level of functional maturity of team members (between M2 and M4), a moderation of both supportive and directive leadership behaviors will be appropriate at this time.
References:
Tuckman’s Team Development Model
What Stage is Your Team in?:
The Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership® Theory: Choosing the Right Leadership Style for the Right People
Hersey and Blanchard's situational leadership model diagrams
https://www.google.com/search?q=hersey+and+blanchard's+situational+leadership+model&hl=en&prmd=imvnsb&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=OiGRUJ70CaiZ0QXKtICQBw&ved=0CDYQsAQ&biw=1030&bih=594
Hi Oge,
ReplyDeleteNice work, BUT...... What happened to following our 7 step process as shown on page 7 of your Engineering Economy table 1-1? It is very important for you to master this approach. Why? First because it will help write your paper, but secondly, this assignment is also designed to help you prepare for the very tough narrative question on the EVP, CEP, PSP and DMRM exams.
Your citations are correct..... Suggest you review what other people have posted and see how they followed the 7 step process.
As for your conclusion, let's plan on revisiting this assignment around W5 or W6 and see if your assessment was or was not correct.
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta