W1_Doyin_Tuckman
Analysis Assessment
“I
am trying to determine which of Tuckman’s Stages or Phases our team is in and
use that to determine which LEADERSHIP
STYLE is appropriate for me to be using”
Item Score Item Score Item Score Item Score
1.
_5_____ 2. _2___
__ 4.
5______ 3. _5_____
5.
___1___ 7. __5___ _ 6.
4______ 8 _1_____
10.
__1____ 9.
3______ 11. 4____ 12. _4_____
15.
__5____ 16. 1______ 13. 5_____ 14. 5______
18.
__5__ 20._2____ 19. _1__ 17. ___4___
21.
__3____ 23. ___3___ 24. _1_____ 22. ___4___
27.
___3___ 28. __1____ 25. ____4_
26. _4_____
29.
___4___ 31. _1_____ 30. 2 ______ 32. __4____
TOTAL
_27__ TOTAL 17___ TOTAL _29__ TOTAL _31__
Forming
Stage Storming Stage Norming Stage Performing Stage
Since the highest score is 31 I perceive that Bistrol 12 Team is in
Performing Stage
The lowest score is 17; therefore Bistrol 12 is not in Storming Stage.
The two high scores of the Norming and Performing Stages confirm that
Bistrol 12 is in the Performing Stage.
1)Develop the FEASIBLE alternatives that will
address the ROOT CAUSE of any problem/opportunity.
Visionary.
Coaching.
Affiliative. .
Demoractic
a.
2) Develop the outcomes for each alternative (minimum 2)
by applying the tools/techniques above to produce a QUANTITATIVE comparison of
the alternatives.
Coaching.
This one-on-one style focuses on developing individuals, showing them how to
improve their performance, and helping to connect their goals to the goals of
the organization. Coaching works best, Mr. Goleman writes, “with employees who
show initiative and want more professional development.” But it can backfire if
it’s perceived as “micromanaging” an employee, and undermines his or her
self-confidence.
Democratic.
This style draws on people’s knowledge and skills, and creates a group
commitment to the resulting goals. It works best when the direction the
organization should take is unclear, and the leader needs to tap the collective
wisdom of the group. Mr. Goleman warns that this consensus-building approach
can be disastrous in times of crisis, when urgent events demand quick
decisions.
a. Explain a little bit about which phase you believe the
team is in based on the survey results and which of the 4 LEADERSHIP STYLES
might be appropriate or best.
3) Selection of the acceptable criteria.
a. What is the CRITERIA to determine which of Tuckman’s
Stage of Phase this team is in?
b. Justify why or explain how you determined this value
4) Compare the outcomes from each alternative analysis
done in Step 3 against the minimum acceptable criteria from Step 4.
a. Summarize the alternatives (usually using a table) and
rank-order them from most preferable to least preferable, identifying which
one(s) meet the minimum acceptable criteria to be considered
5) Democratic This style draws
on people’s knowledge and skills, and creates a group commitment to the
resulting goals. It works best when the direction the organization should take
is unclear, and the leader needs to tap the collective wisdom of the group.
6)
Performance Monitoring
& Post Evaluation of Result
Teams performance would be would
be tracked on weekly basis via SPI and CPI
7) Provide your REFERENCES (preferably a minimum of 3)
formatted using APA Style.
For Online References
Hi Doyin,
ReplyDeleteOK, not bad for your first blog posting. You did more or less followed our 7 step process, but you really didn't answer the questions? Seems you missed step 6, which was to justify why you picked the alternative you did based on the selection criteria.
Also, you need to go to "The OWL@Purdue" and learn how to properly cite on line references. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/
Bottom line- given you had some good examples to follow, this posting, while acceptable is not up to the standards I expect to see for future postings. Suggest you go back and review what others have done and be sure to read my comments.
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta
okay Dr
Delete