Problem definition
In scheduling, activity durations depend on availability
of resources. Schedule may be logically correct and in agreement with the
estimate but can only be achievable when resources are allocated and levelled
over the project time.
Feasible alternatives
Wildly oscillating staffing
Develop the outcome of each alternative
Using the
structural skid fabrication of the Retrofit project with man-hour listed below;
STRUCTURAL SKID
FABRICATION 11
Work Package: Skid frame 11A
Work Package No Description MH Total MH
11A_001 Cut Primary beam
members 8
11A_002 Cut Cross members 48
11A_003 Cut Stiffeners 56
11A_004 Fit up beam members 64
11A_005 Fit up stiffeners 36
11A_006 Weld beam members 64
11A_007 Weld Stiffeners 30
306
Work package: Handrails 11B
11B_001 Cut handrail pipe 48
11B_002 Fit up pipe 64
11B_003 Weld handrail 48
160
Work package: Drain Pan 11C
11C_001 Cut plate 6
11C_002 Fit up plate 12
11C_003 Weld drain pan 24
42
Work package: Grating 11D
11D_001 Cut
grating 16 16
Total MH 524
Table 1 Manhour allocation
Option 1 Resource Loading and
levelling
|
Days
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
Structural Skid 11
|
Fitter
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
Welder
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2 Resource loading and levelling by author
The planned % progress
based on the allotted man-hours will be as in Table 3 below;
|
Day
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
Structural Skid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skid frame
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11A_001
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11A_002
|
16
|
49
|
82
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11A_003
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
37.5
|
62.5
|
87.5
|
100
|
|
|
|
11A-004
|
|
|
25
|
50
|
75
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
11A_005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
88
|
100
|
|
|
11A_006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
76
|
100
|
|
|
11A_007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
100
|
Handrail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11B_001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
11B_002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
Drain pan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11C_001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
Option 2 No resource loading and
levelling
Without
resource allocation there is no plan
The attribute for the selection criteria is;
·
Resource availability
·
Project visibility
·
Target delivery
·
Efficiency
Analysis of alternatives
Option 1 Resource loading and levelling
Resource loading involves allocation of resource
requirements on each individual activity. Resources are limited and for the use
to be optimized they have to be allocated to tasks and their use tracked to eliminate
wastes. Levelling is the efficient utilization of the resources over the
project life. From the resource loading of table 2, the number of welders
determines the number of welding machines so with fitters and grinding
machines. No point allocating welding when there is no welding machine or when
fit up is still ongoing. With the man-hour allocation of each task, the
progress plan can be generated from which the actual progress can be compared.
Option 2 Blind allocation
Without resource allocation, it is impossible to know if
schedule can be met. Not having a resource plan is an assurance of schedule
delays and projects being run blindly.
Selection of preferred alternative
Schedule can only work when it is based on available
resources. Resource loading includes defining the necessary resources needed to
execute each task within the allocated time frame. This allows for a plan for
staffing, material and equipment requirement from early start schedule and from
late start schedule to be developed. This can then be levelled over the project
duration to maximise efficiency. With this resource availability is assured and
project visibility is guaranteed.
Performance monitoring and evaluation
With schedule resourced and levelled a plan is generated.
This forms the baseline of progress measurement and status reporting.
References
Orczyk, J. J. Project Labour Cost Control, Skills &
Knowledge of Cost Engineering (5th ed.), (PP 21.1.-21.6) WV, AACE
International
Humphreys, G. C. (2011). Resource Loading And Levelling
The Schedule, Project Management Using Earned Value (2nd ed.), (PP. 189-196)
CA, Humphreys & Associates Inc.
Humphreys, G. C. (2011). Establishing The Performance
Measurement Baseline, Project Management Using Earned Value (2nd
ed.), (PP. 519-527) CA, Humphreys & Associates Inc.
Awesome, Charlie......
ReplyDeleteDoing a really great job, but my only question is why did you list only one feasible alternative? Then measure or analyze two of them?
Nothing wrong with what you ended up doing except for the fact that you should have listed both alternatives?
Anyway, everything else was just fine.....
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta, Indonesia