1. Problem Definition or Opportunity Statement:
" Evaluation of preliminary cost estimate for 3.6 Km length of storm water pipe construction using simple cost estimating techniques"
Table 1-1 Historic Cost Data - sourced from similar past projects
2. Development of Feasible Alternatives:
The alternatives methods of cost estimating techniques to be considered for the preliminary cost estimating analysis of the proposed project includes:
I. Unit Cost Technique
II. Cost Index
III. Weighted Cost Index
IV. Factor Techniques
V. Power Sizing Technique
3. Development of Outcome of Each Alternative:
The outcomes for each alternative is developed by evaluating historic cost data using the formulas for the different types of simple cost estimating techniques:
4. Selection of Acceptable Criteria:
The acceptable criteria used to select the acceptable cost estimates is estimating technique that produced the highest value of cost estimate. The effects of Escalations due to inflations and Contingencies are not considered.
5. Analysis And Comparison of Outcome From Each Alternatives:
The various outcomes of each estimating techniques is as summarized below viz:
6. Selection of the Preferred Alternative:
The selection of the preferred cost estimate will be based on the cost estimating technique that produces the highest cost estimate value.The selected estimated cost is using the Target Cost = N 233 million
7. Performance Reporting And Evaluation of Results:
The performance and monitoring of the cost estimates can be evaluated by considering the effects of inflations or cost escalations and contingency plans for the proposed project.
References:
1. Sullivan William, Wicks M. Elin & Keolling C. Pactricks (2009) Engineering Economy Fourteenth Edition Pearson International Edition
2. Giammalvo, D. Paul (2012. October 22) Integrated Portfolio (Asset), Program (Operations) and
Project Management Methodology Course (Cost Engineering) Slide # 2 P. 77 of 105
3. Y.O. Lam Index Numbers: ( Relevant to AAT Examination Paper 4 : Business Economics and Financial Mathematics Retrieved from
AWESOME posting, Reginald!!! Wonderful!!!
ReplyDeleteNow if you really want to have some fun with this same case study for your W6 posting, go here and read over this paper from one of our recent classes here in Indonesia. http://pmworldjournal.net/?article=exploring-gold-as-alternative-currency-for-future-cost-estimation-in-telecommunication-projects
Then using the price of an ounce of gold in 2006, 2008 and 2010, divide the cost of the project by the then cost of gold, turning the project costs from Naira into ounces of gold equivalence.
Then using the cost projection curves shown in Figure 15 on page 14, project the cost into the future.
Explained another way, instead of using the Escalation Factor of 1.06, you will be using the purchasing power of gold, which today, is much more stable than the US dollar. (or the Euro, Pound, Yen or any of the other paper currencies)
Keep up the good work and looking forward to seeing more postings like this in the future.
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta
Whoops...... Do the update for your W5 posting, not W6......
ReplyDeleteAlso, good job using Snag It or whatever other screen capture software you are using. Se how it makes it a lot easier to format graphics for your blog?
It will also make writing your paper a whole lot easier.
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta